Click for full-sized scanned image
Click for full-sized scanned image
Union Correspondence, etc.
Opinions of various officers.
George W. Snyder, lieutenant of Engineers, February 28, 1861: 4 regiments, or 4,000 men; 4 vessels of war.
R.K. Meade, jr., second lieutenant of Engineers, February 28, 1861: 5,000 men, at least; supported by gunboats.
S.W. Crawford, February 28, 1861: 4,000 men, supported by the Navy.
Norman J. Hall, second lieutenant, First Artillery, February 28, 1861: 3,500 men; 7 war vessels.
J.C. Davis, first lieutenant, First Artillery, February 28, 1861: 3,000 men; 6 war vessels.
Theodore Talbot, first lieutenant, First Artillery, February 28, 1861: 3,000 men and naval vessels.
T. Seymour, brevet captain and lieutenant, First Artillery, February 28, 1861.[1]
A. Doubleday, captain, First Artillery, February 28, 1861: 10,000 men and Navy.
J.G. Foster, captain of Engineers, February 28, 1861: 6,000 regulars or 20,000 volunteers to take them; 10,000 regulars or 30,000 volunteers to hold them.
Captain Ward, who came here believing it practicable, abandoned it after consultation with General Scott. General Scott and the Chief of the Coast Survey, Mr. Foster, evidently a man of sound sense and experience as a seaman, who is acquainted with the waters, having formerly been attached to the Coast Survey, proposed to make the attempt with cutters of light draught and large dimensions. He was in a measure sustained by Commodore Stringham, but did not suppose provisions for more than one or two months could be furnished at a time.
(To view this page in its Source Category, click HERE for Part 1 and HERE for Part 2)
